China’s investment-driven growth model is unsustainable in a post-crisis world of low global growth. Weak external demand magnifies the adverse side effects of this growth path – inefficient use of capital, excess industrial capacity, deflationary pressures, high corporate leverage. When these problems are allied to demographic challenges, China appears to be one of the world’s leading economies for which the secular stagnation argument could most readily apply. China’s slowdown is a challenge for the world economy given that China has accounted for nearly a third of global GDP growth since 2007. The challenge for China’s policy-makers is to address the non-linear risks implicit in a highly leveraged and deflationary economy shifting to a lower growth path. Monetary policy will need to remain exceptionally loose. Given this backdrop, there are growing downside risks to the CNY. Already Chinese institutions are increasing their holdings of overseas assets and the scale of China’s domestic liquidity is such that only a marginal increase in demand for foreign assets can swamp the balance of payments: China’s M2 approximates the combined M2 of the US, Germany and Japan. The CNY forward curve would appear to under-price the likely depreciation of the CNY over the next 12 months. Continue reading →